|
Various studies have reported cases of selective sparing of environmental sound recognition involving animal,
machine or nonverbal human noises (Eustache, Lechevalier, Viader, & Lambert, 1990; Tanaka, Yamadori, & Mori, 1987).
The evidence is less clear for selective loss of environmental sound recognition, which has never been observed at onset
but only during recovery (Montomura, Yamadori, Mori, & Tamaru, 1986). The recognition of most environmental
sounds is thought to be primarily accomplished by secondary auditory association cortices (Mendez & Geehan, 1988).
Table 1.2
Summary of Some Well Documented Cases of Selective Impairment of Melodic Processing
| Study |
Auditory domain |
Lesion Location |
|
Case(s) |
Speech |
Music |
Environmental |
(where available) |
| Peretz (1993b) |
GL |
x |
x |
XX |
Bilateral temporal |
| Peretz et al. (1994) |
CN |
XX |
XX |
XX |
Bilateral temporal |
| Ayotte et al. (2000) |
RC |
XX |
XX |
XX |
Bilateral temporal |
| Peretz (1990) |
VG and VC |
XX |
XX |
XX |
RIGHT hemisphere |
| Fries & Swihart (1990) |
1 case |
XX |
XX |
XX |
RIGHT temporal |
| Wilson & Pressing (1999) |
HJ |
XX |
XX |
XX |
RIGHT temporal |
| Ayotte et al. (2000) |
2 cases |
XX |
XX |
|
RIGHT temporal |
| Ayotte et al. (2000) |
NR |
XX |
XX |
XX |
RIGHT temporal |
|
1 case |
|
XX |
|
LEFT temporal |
Note. XX = clear impairment of function; x = slight impairment of function
                                                                     
Home - FAQ - Register - Forums - My Feedback - Contact Us - Terms and Conditions Free Personality Tests : Relationships - Personality - Beliefs - Wellbeing - Attitudes - Behaviour - Cognitive Abilities Scientific Research - Psychlopedia All Rights Reserved © Psych-it.com.au
|